The Future is Equal

oxfam

Record number of people displaced into neighbouring countries as Sudan conflict marks three years – Oxfam

As Sudan’s gruelling conflict enters its fourth year, a record number of people have now been displaced by the world’s worst humanitarian and displacement crisis, accelerating hunger and suffering.

More than 30 million people – over half the population – in Sudan urgently need humanitarian support. Nearly 14 million people have been forced from their homes since the conflict began in April 2023. Almost a third – 4.5 million – fled to neighbouring countries Chad, the Central African Republic, Egypt, Ethiopia, Libya and South Sudan; countries already struggling with under-funded emergencies.

The crisis is compounded by the decimation of lifesaving support from the UN and humanitarian agencies, including Oxfam, who have been forced to either stop or scale back programmes across the region due to funding cuts. Some aid agencies have closed entirely, while those still operating are now only able to assist only a fraction of those in need.

More than 1.3 million people have crossed the border to South Sudan, a country already grappling with hunger and insecurity with over 300,000 displaced by renewed fighting in Jonglei state. In Renk, the main transit centre is now operating at more than four times its capacity.

Oxfam staff in Renk have reported that, families are having to sleep out in the open areas as spaces run out. Water and food rations have significantly reduced with families receiving less than half of their monthly food rations while access to clean water has dropped leaving thousands to rely on unsafe water sources. 26 deaths were also reported since January linked to severe malnutrition and shortages of medical supplies.

Oxfam in Africa Director, Ms Fati N’Zi-Hassane said:

“This is a damning political failure. It is devastating that millions of people are in desperate need across so many countries, at a time when aid cuts have drastically reduced support. It’s completely unacceptable.

“In Renk, before the funding cuts, Oxfam was supporting over 40,000 people with lifesaving assistance, including water, food and cash assistance. That number has dropped to just over 7,000 people and no longer includes food support. Families are having to survive on five litres of water a day and a latrine that once supported 28 people is now used by over 70, more than double the maximum standard.”

Hamdi, a mother of three who recently arrived in Renk said to Oxfam staff:

“I lost most of my family to the conflict in Sudan. I walked for days to get to South Sudan but until now I have not managed to get a space for my three children in the transit center, we had to set up a makeshift home in the open area which is not safe for us all. The food we are getting is not enough but at least we are safe from the war for now.”

Chad alone has taken in over one million refugees from Sudan – more than in the previous two decades combined – while an estimated 3 million people in the country will need food assistance at the peak of the upcoming lean season from July to September with Sudanese refugees in the eastern province being the hardest hit.

Yet funding to Chad continue to drop. U.S. contributions to the refugee crisis dropped from $87.5 million in 2024 to $39.9 million in 2025 – covering only 9.8% of requirements in 2025 even as the number of refugees continues to increase, stretching the response.

Germany and the African Union have confirmed plans to co-host the third international Sudan conference in Berlin on 15 April. The meeting aims to support peace efforts and mobilize humanitarian aid amid ongoing conflict.

Ms N’Zi-Hassane said:

“As leaders gather In Berlin, they must go beyond boardroom discussions and ensure real progress towards both peace and an urgent funding increase for the crisis. Sudanese people and their neighbours have suffered long enough. They cannot afford more meetings that do nothing to both end the conflict and the misery millions are being forced to endure.”

ENDS

Notes to editors

  • Oxfam is supporting refugee response in Chad and South Sudan with clean water and hygiene facilities, food, cash assistance and protection services.

  • In 2025, Sudan Regional Refugee Response plan was only 25% funded, leaving critical gaps in lifesaving support.

  • 4.5 million people fled to neighbouring countries according to UNHCR

  • FEWS NET estimates that nearly 3 million people will need food assistance at the height of the lean season in Chad

  • Food Insecurity and malnutrition in South Sudan remain extremely high according to the IPC with 7.5 million people –53% projected to experience high level of food insecurity (IPC Phase 3 or above)

  • US contribution to UNHCR Chad Refugee Response

  • Emergency standards recommend no more than 50 people per latrine at the onset of a crisis, improving to 20 over time. In Renk, South Sudan that has risen to 70 or more per latrine—pushing facilities beyond safe limits and increasing the risk of outbreaks such as cholera and dysentery.

  • For water, Sphere standards set a minimum of 7.5 litres per person per day in water-scarce emergency contexts, with an ideal target of 20 litres

Contact information:

For more details, please contact: [email protected]

Death by aid cuts: Oxfam reaction to OECD preliminary data on aid spending in 2025

In response to the publication today of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) preliminary data on Official Development Assistance (ODA) for 2025, Oxfam Aotearoa’s Advocacy and Policy Lead Nick Henry said:

“This report shows New Zealand aid fell by 12.8% in 2025. This is a huge problem for our Pacific neighbours who face an accelerating climate crisis.

Now more than ever, New Zealand should be standing with our Pacific neighbours with support for climate adaptation and sustainable development. But the New Zealand Government has not renewed our climate funding commitment for the Pacific and has not increased other aid enough to make up for the shortfall.

Unfortunately, this means New Zealand is now part of the problem.

Oxfam has previously praised the good work done through New Zealand’s support for climate action in the Pacific. We call on the New Zealand Government to restore and extend that support to our Pacific neighbours in this year’s budget.”

Meanwhile Oxfam’s Development Finance Lead Didier Jacobs said:

“Wealthy governments are turning their backs on the lives of millions of women, men and children in the Global South with these severe aid cuts. They collectively slashed aid by 23% in 2025. Based on aid’s crucial role in combating diseases like HIV-AIDS and malaria, the Institute of Global Health of Barcelona estimated that global aid cuts of such magnitude would kill hundreds of thousands of people in 2025 alone. If this trend continues, aid cuts could kill over 9 million people by 2030.

At a time where aid cuts are already driving instability and fostering greater inequality, government donors are cutting life-saving aid budgets while financing conflict and militarization. Cuts from donors including Germany, France and the UK will be felt by the world’s poorest. The United States shut down USAID and recklessly cut aid by $37 billion in 2025, and the Trump administration has been preparing to ask Congress for tens of billions in additional funding for bombs, ammunition, and other military equipment relating to its unlawful war against Iran.

Governments must restore their aid budgets and shore up the global humanitarian system that faces its most serious crisis in decades. There are other ways to find tens of billions of dollars, such as by taxing the $2.84 trillions of dollars that the super-rich hide in tax havens.”

ENDS

Notes to editors

The OECD preliminary data shows the DAC countries’ aid spending for 2025 was $174.3 billion, a cut of 23% from 2024.

The Institute of Global Health in Barcelona released a study in Lancet Journal (February 2026) that evaluated the impact of ODA on mortality rates around the world. It estimates that aid cuts in 2025 alone, assuming a 21% aid cut, would be responsible for 695,238 excess deaths, and that, if the aid cut trend continued, it could kill 9,416,417 by 2030.

The US Administration is reportedly planning to seek a war appropriation of $80-$100 billion from Congress.

Oxfam estimates that the top 0.1% richest people worldwide hide $2.84 trillion in tax havens. Even a small tax on that wealth would yield much more than the amount of aid cuts.

Contact information:

For more details, please contact: [email protected]

REACTION: Peace talks only successful if ceasefire encompasses the region, as Israel launches deadliest strikes yet on Lebanon

Reacting to news today of a two-week ceasefire between US/Israel and Iran, Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar said:

“We share in the widespread relief that the world has avoided the atrocities President Trump threatened yesterday and that the war between the US and Iran has paused while diplomatic talks commence. The ceasefire comes after weeks of escalating threats and unlawful attacks by the US and Israel on Iran, as well as retaliation from Iran, that have killed, injured, and displaced civilians across the region. However, until there is an end to all hostilities, across the entire region, no one will feel truly safe.

“This pause must become a stepping stone for wider peace. Israel’s ongoing invasion in Lebanon, its destructive occupation of Palestinian Territory, ground incursion and airstrikes in Syria, its continued attacks in Gaza, and violent attacks and territorial expansion in the West Bank are still continuing despite the provisional cessation of violence with Iran. This deadly toll across the Middle East is intolerable and must stop.

“Israel’s attacks on Lebanon continued with huge strikes today, reportedly killing at least 80 people. Another 1,500 people have been killed and 4,500 injured since last month. Israeli massive forced displacement orders cover more than 20 per cent of the population and humanitarian agencies cannot access critical projects to assist people in the most need.

“Any peace agreement must include the unconditional withdrawal of Israel’s forces in Lebanon and Syria, an end to its unlawful occupation of Gaza and the Syria Golan, and its annexation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.”

-Ends-

Contact information:

For more details, please contact: [email protected]

Humanitarian organisations call for New Zealand Government support for humanitarian access in Middle East

Statement by the Council for International Development, Oxfam, Save the Children, Anglican Missions, Tear Fund and Child Fund

The conflict across the Middle East and its impact on global energy supplies continues to dominate the airwaves. While a ceasefire for Iran is welcome, we are deeply concerned at ongoing strikes in Lebanon and the continued restrictions on humanitarian aid and supplies to civilians in the region. We call on the New Zealand Government to support and enable the critical work of humanitarians through all diplomatic means available.

During the latest escalation, thousands have been killed and hundreds of thousands have been displaced. Strikes on civilian areas, schools, hospitals and airports have created enormous suffering. A whole generation of children will be scarred for life.

New Zealanders have shown enormous care and generosity to communities in the region, including through millions of dollars donated to humanitarian organisations which provide lifesaving support in Gaza and Lebanon. But new restrictions on humanitarian access are making it incredibly difficult to deliver that support.

In December 2025, the Government of Israel denied more than 30 international NGOs working in Gaza and the West Bank their re-registration, threatening their ability to continue essential hygiene, healthcare, food, and social support programs.

The Government of Israel subsequently closed crossings and aid corridors into Gaza following the escalation of the conflict in Iran. As of today, crossings remain severely restricted, disrupting the flow of essential food, medical supplies and fuel to people in dire need.

These decisions combined are deepening the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where many people cannot access enough food to feed their families, and women are being discharged into unsafe environments hours after giving birth. Ongoing strikes in Lebanon have killed hundreds of children and threaten to compound an already devastating humanitarian situation.

New Zealand has a proud history of standing up for international humanitarian law and the protection of civilians during conflicts. We call on the Government to continue in this tradition by using diplomatic means to call for a ceasefire from all parties to the conflict in the Middle East, and for all parties to fully observe International Humanitarian Law.

This must include the active protection of humanitarian workers and all other civilians, as well as the freedom of humanitarian organisations to operate, travel and transport supplies into and across the territories and crossings under their control.

-Ends-

Contact information:

For more details, please contact: [email protected]

Adoption of death penalty law by the Israeli Knesset requires urgent EU measures, says 30 NGOs

As humanitarian and human rights organisations that have worked for years in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, we are appalled by the Israeli Knesset’s decision to approve a bill that makes death penalty effectively mandatory in the West Bank and which will de facto apply exclusively to Palestinians.

On 30 March, the Knesset approved a bill, introduced by the party of Minister of National Security Ben-Gvir, expanding the use of the death penalty in both military and civilian courts. Although Israeli law has long provided for the death penalty for cases of genocide and wartime espionage, Israel has not carried out executions nor imposed death sentences since 1962. This new legislation not only marks a significant regression: it also does so by imposing capital punishment on de facto ethnic or national grounds and by diluting basic legal safeguards.

In the West Bank – excluding East Jerusalem – the law imposes the death penalty as the default sentence for those convicted of intentional killings classified as acts of terrorism under Israeli legislation, allowing life imprisonment – and life imprisonment only – in “special circumstances” that are not specified in law. Military courts may impose capital punishment by a simple majority, even without a prosecutorial request. Sentences cannot be commuted or pardoned and must be carried out within 90 days. Notably, Israeli settlers in the West Bank are explicitly excluded from the scope of this provision.

Within Israel, civilian courts may impose the death penalty or life imprisonment for intentional killings, if they are committed with the aim of “negating the existence of the State of Israel.”

Therefore, while the law does not explicitly reference ethnicity or nationality, it is effectively designed to target Palestinians exclusively. It also introduces an exceptional execution regime by hanging, characterised by secrecy, and limited access to legal counsel and external oversight.

The European Union has consistently held that capital punishment is cruel, inhuman, and incompatible with human dignity under all circumstances. But even beyond this principled stance, the new Israeli law breaches basic safeguards recognised by the international community to protect the rights of those facing the death penalty. Its discriminatory nature and lack of due process guarantee, violate the right to life and protections enshrined in international humanitarian and human rights law, such as the Fourth Geneva Convention, the Hague Regulations, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Convention Against Torture.

Diplomatic engagement by the EU and its Member States urging Israel to reverse course has so far proven ineffective. This appalling development occurs amid an ongoing manmade humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, which a UN Commission of Inquiry, multiple Palestinian, Israeli and international organizations, and independent experts have characterised as constituting genocide, and against the backdrop of an accelerating de facto annexation of the West Bank, as acknowledged by the International Court of Justice in its Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024. The adoption of the death penalty law is thus part of a pattern of discriminatory policies and practices against Palestinians, which in the same Advisory Opinion the International Court of Justice has found to violate Article 3 CERD, which prohibits racial segregation and apartheid.

In furtherance of these policies, Israel has already crossed established EU red lines: the advancement of settlement construction in the E1 area, which breaks the territorial contiguity of the West Bank, with the intent to prevent a future Palestinian state; the ban on UNRWA and attacks on its facilities, including schools and clinics built and run with EU contributions; the expulsion of international NGOs through restrictive registration procedures; forced evictions of Palestinian residents in East Jerusalem; forced displacement of tens of thousands of Palestinians and widespread demolitions of Palestinian homes and infrastructure in the West Bank, including EU-funded projects; persistent impunity for abuses by Israeli security forces and state-backed settler violence; reports of widespread and systemic torture and mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners; restrictions on religious freedoms; attacks on journalists; and denial of access to EU officials.

As also recalled by the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kallas in her statement of 31 March, the EU-Israel Association Agreement establishes respect for democratic principles as an essential element of EU-Israel relations. A review conducted by the EU in June 2025 based on Article 2 of the Agreement found Israel in breach of its human rights obligations for serious abuses against Palestinians and violations of the laws of war, both in Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.

Nine months on, the time for action is long overdue. The European Union must uphold its stated principles and legal obligations by finally suspending, as a minimum immediate measure, the trade component of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and adopting other measures, as proposed by President von der Leyen in September 2025.

Signatories

  1. 11.11.11
  2. ACT Alliance EU
  3. Act Church of Sweden
  4. ActionAid International
  5. Amnesty International
  6. American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
  7. Bystanders No More
  8. Caritas Europa
  9. Caritas MONA (Middle East and North Africa)
  10. Child Rights International Network (CRIN)
  11. Children Not Numbers
  12. Christian Aid
  13. CIDSE – International Family of Catholic Social Justice Organisations
  14. CNCD-11.11.11
  15. Cooperazione Internazionale Sud-Sud (CISS)
  16. DanChurchAid
  17. 80:20 Educating and Acting for a Better World
  18. EuroMed Rights
  19. Finn Church Aid
  20. Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (GCR2P)
  21. Human Rights Watch
  22. Insecurity Insight
  23. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  24. Lebanese Center for Human Rights (CLDH)
  25. Norwegian Church Aid
  26. Oxfam
  27. Pax Christi International
  28. Public Commitee Against Torture in Israel
  29. Trócaire
  30. United Against Inhumanity

Contact information:

For more details, please contact: [email protected]

AIDA-led Statement Petition Hearing

Humanitarian organizations reaffirm decision to pursue petition before Israel’s High Court of Justice following recent hearing.  

Today, 18 members from a coalition of humanitarian organizations represented by the Association of International Development Agencies (AIDA), have reaffirmed their decision to proceed with a petition before Israel’s High Court of Justice, following the hearing held last week.  

The petition was brought by AIDA and a number of other INGOs operating in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), following the introduction of a new Israeli registration system which placed dozens of international humanitarian organizations, including many AIDA members, at risk of further restricting their ability to operate in Israel and the oPt. Although applications under the new system were submitted, they remain stalled because of demands for extensive confidential staff data. 

Given the severe implications for humanitarian access, AIDA members continue this legal process because they believe the case raises essential questions of law that deserve full judicial consideration. At the hearing, the Court restricted arguments to the narrow issue of data privacy, preventing petitioning organizations from presenting the broader legal and security issues involved, including Israel’s obligations as an occupying power and the legality of measures that could impede humanitarian activity. AIDA members were deeply concerned that the hearing did not provide sufficient space to address these central questions, and that petitioning organisations, as well as diplomats, were not allowed in to the court hearing, while senior Israeli government officials, their entourages and other observers not affiliated with any of the proceedings, were permitted entry and were disruptive.

The State has confirmed that it is requiring the submission of extensive personal data for all staff in Gaza and the West Bank, regardless of any connection to entry into Israel. In a context where hundreds of humanitarian workers have been killed, the compelled transfer of sensitive data without clear safeguards, transparency, or limitations on use creates real risks. It would also breach international data protection standards and the legal obligations of many organizations based in the European Union. This places petitioning organizations in an impossible position, as compliance with these requirements would violate their legal obligations and duty of care, while non-compliance would likely result in the rejection of their petition. 

Petitioning organizations stress that they are committed to doing everything in their power to ensure they can continue to operate in the oPt and continue delivering assistance under Palestinian Authority registration, but they fear that the loss of Israeli registration will further hinder their ability to operate across the territory at a time when humanitarian needs remain overwhelming. INGOs are integral to the response. In Gaza they deliver more than half of all food assistance, support most field hospitals, and provide essential shelter, water, sanitation, nutrition, mine action, and emergency education services. Even while organisations held valid registration, INGOs were blocked from bringing goods into Gaza for over a year and, during the interim period, had requests to deploy international staff into the Strip denied. Any further reduction in operational access would have predictable and even more devastating consequences for civilians. 

Given the catastrophic conditions in Gaza and the deteriorating situation in the West Bank, including increased settler violence, rising displacement, and deepening access restrictions. Humanitarian access must expand rather than contract. 

AIDA and petitioning members therefore call on the Israeli authorities to review and adjust the current registration procedures, so they do not obstruct humanitarian relief. They also call on donor governments to use all available diplomatic, political, and legal avenues to press for the suspension and reversal of measures that restrict humanitarian access.

Ends

Note to editors

On International Law including IHL, and EU-Israel Treaty Relations 

  • As an occupying Power, Israel is bound by the Fourth Geneva Convention, which imposes a positive obligation to allow and facilitate relief schemes for the benefit of the protected population (see, in particular, Articles 59 and 63). 

  • In this framework, humanitarian organizations must be permitted to carry out their activities in accordance with their humanitarian functions, and the occupying Power may not impose changes to their personnel or structure that would undermine those activities.

  • Measures that condition the presence or operation of humanitarian organizations on the disclosure of sensitive personal data are inconsistent with this legal framework. Such measures effectively convert a duty to facilitate humanitarian relief into a mechanism of control, which is not provided for under international humanitarian law.

  • Furthermore, under international law, the State of Palestine retains sovereign authority to invite, consent to, and oversee humanitarian and development assistance within its territory. This competence is not extinguished by the fact of occupation; rather, it continues to operate alongside – and to limit – the authority of the occupying Power. Is it reflected in Annex III (Protocol Concerning Civil Affairs) of the 1995 Interim Agreement between the State of Israel and the Palestine Libera on Organization (PLO) and reiterated by Israel in its submission to the International Court of Justice in the 2025 advisory proceedings on the presence and activities of intentional organizations. 

  • As affirmed by the International Court of Justice in its 2024 and 2025 Advisory Opinion, occupation does not confer sovereignty or title, does not displace the sovereign rights of the occupied State, and does not authorize the restructuring of humanitarian space in disregard of the will and needs of the occupied population. Claims that Israel may unilaterally exclude organizations invited by Palestinian authorities, or dictate the terms of their operation irrespective of Palestinian consent, are difficult to reconcile with peremptory norms of international law, including the right to self-determination. 

  • Article 2 of the EU–Israel Association Agreement elevates respect for human rights and democratic principles to an “essential element” of the relationship. Where a partner State adopts measures that foreseeably compel EU-domiciled entities to act in breach of EU law, including core data protection obligations under the General Data Protection Regula on, it becomes a question of compliance with the normative foundation of the agreement itself.

  • EU-based INGOs are bound by GDPR Chapters II and V to ensure that any transfer of personal data is lawful, necessary, proportionate, and subject to enforceable safeguards. Article 48 of the GDPR is explicit in that disclosures pursuant to third-country administrative measures must be grounded in an international agreement or otherwise comply with EU law. A unilateral demand backed by the threat of exclusion from humanitarian operations does not satisfy that standard. 

  • To place EU entities in a position where compliance with one legal regime necessitates violation of another is, from the EU’s perspective, an interference with the effectiveness of its own law. That interference feeds directly into the doctrine of good faith performance of treaties, codified in Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Articles 26 and 27. Parties must perform treaties in good faith and may not invoke internal law as justification for failure to perform. While Israel is not bound to apply EU law as such, it is bound, within the framework of the Association Agreement, to conduct itself in a manner that does not defeat the object and purpose of the treaty or render its partner’s legal obligations inoperable in practice. Measures that systematically force EU-regulated actors into non-compliance with EU law, as a condition of accessing occupied territory for humanitarian work, risk crossing that line.

Contact information:

For more details, please contact: [email protected]